Request A Quote
Capable of producing highly intricate and detailed parts.
Retains the mechanical properties of metals
Suitable for high-volume production with consistent quality
Reduces material waste and machining time compared to traditional methods.
1.Feedstock Preparation: Fine metal powders are mixed with a binder material (usually a combination of polymers and waxes) to create a feedstock. This mixture is granulated into pellets.
2.Injection Molding: The feedstock pellets are heated until the binder melts, allowing the mixture to be injected into a mold cavity under high pressure. This forms a "green part," which is in the shape of the final product but not yet fully metal.
3.Debinding: The green part undergoes a process to remove most of the binder material. This can be done through solvent extraction, thermal debinding, or catalytic debinding, resulting in a "brown part."
4.Sintering: The brown part is heated in a controlled atmosphere to a temperature below the melting point of the metal. This process removes the remaining binder and causes the metal particles to bond together, resulting in densification and shrinkage to create the final solid metal part.
5.Post-Processing: The final part may undergo additional processes such as machining, heat treatment, or surface finishing to achieve the desired specifications and properties.
1.Complex Geometries: Capable of producing intricate and precise parts with complex shapes and fine details.
2.High Precision: Produces parts with tight tolerances and excellent surface finish.
3.Material Versatility: Can be used with a wide range of metals, including stainless steel, titanium, and various alloys.
4.High Density: Results in parts with high density and good mechanical properties, similar to those produced by conventional manufacturing methods.
1.Cost-Effective for Complex Parts: Economical for producing small, complex parts in large quantities.
2.Material Efficiency: Minimizes material waste compared to traditional machining processes.
3.High Production Rate: Suitable for high-volume production with consistent quality.
4.Design Flexibility: Allows for the creation of parts that would be difficult or impossible to produce with other manufacturing methods.
5.Reduced Secondary Operations: Often eliminates the need for additional machining or finishing, reducing overall production time and cost.
1.Initial Investment: High upfront costs for tooling and equipment can be a barrier for small production runs.
2.Shrinkage and Distortion: Parts can experience significant shrinkage during sintering, which needs to be accurately controlled to maintain dimensional tolerances.
3.Binder Removal: The debinding process can be time-consuming and complex, requiring careful control to avoid defects.
4.Material Limitations: Not all metals and alloys are suitable for MIM due to the specific requirements of the process.
5.Size and Weight Constraints: Generally limited to smaller parts, as larger components can be challenging to produce without defects.
| Stainless Steel | 303, 304,316/316L,440C, and 420P |
| Tool Steel | M2 |
| Soft Magnetic Steel | Fe-Ni50, Fe3Si, FeCo50 etc |
| Tungsten Heavy Alloy | Tungsten Nickel Copper etc |
| WC-Co Cemented Carbide | Tungsten carbide-cobalt |
| Electropolishing | Metal Plating |
| Anodizing (Type II or Type III) | Heat Treatment |
| Media Tumbling | As-Sintered |
| Custom | |